Giordano v. Valhalla Heating Plant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Giordano v. Valhalla Heating Plant

32 A.D.3d 897, 820 N.Y.S.2d 805

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 19, 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 A.D.3d 897 (Giordano v. Valhalla Heating Plant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Giordano v. Valhalla Heating Plant, 32 A.D.3d 897, 820 N.Y.S.2d 805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), dated August 11, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred and denied his cross motion for leave to amend the caption and the complaint, and to consolidate the action with other actions.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, and properly denied the plaintiff’s cross motion (see Giordano v Westchester County Dept. of Parks, Recreation & Conservation, 32 AD3d 897 [2006] [decided herewith]). Prudenti, P.J., Adams, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Barone, J.), dated August 11, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred and denied his cross motion for leave to amend the caption and the complaint, and to consolidate the action with other actions.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, and properly denied the plaintiff’s cross motion (see Giordano v Westchester County Dept. of Parks, Recreation & Conservation, 32 AD3d 897 [2006] [decided herewith]). Prudenti, P.J., Adams, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.3d 897, 820 N.Y.S.2d 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giordano-v-valhalla-heating-plant-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack