Giordano v. State
This text of 160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 460 (Giordano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner has invoked the original jurisdiction of this court by a petition in habeas corpus to obtain his release from incarceration in a penal institution to which he was sentenced after trial and conviction on a charge of being an habitual criminal, and questions the constitutionality of the Habitual Criminal Act (Section 13744-1 et seq., General Code, Section 2961.11 et seq., Revised Code) and the effect thereon of the Indeterminate Sentence Act (Section 2166 et seq., General Code, Section 5145.01 et seq., Revised Code).
The petition contains no allegation of fact which entitles petitioner to the relief sought. The relief prayed for is denied. Warden v. Alvis, Warden, ante, 21, 113 N. E. (2d), 14.
Petitioner remanded to custody.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 Ohio St. (N.S.) 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giordano-v-state-ohio-1954.