Giordano v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Giordano v. State

229 So. 3d 1220

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 9, 2017

DocketNo. SC17-1375

StatusPublished

This text of 229 So. 3d 1220 (Giordano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Giordano v. State, 229 So. 3d 1220 (Fla. 2017).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on Certified Direct Conflict of Decisions pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution (1980), and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(vi), and the Court having determined that it should decline to exercise jurisdiction, it is ordered that the Petition for Review is denied.

No Motion for Rehearing will be entertained by the Court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.330(d)(2).

LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, J., dissents with an opinion, in which LABARGA, C. J,, and QUINCE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on Certified Direct Conflict of Decisions pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution (1980), and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(vi), and the Court having determined that it should decline to exercise jurisdiction, it is ordered that the Petition for Review is denied.

No Motion for Rehearing will be entertained by the Court. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.330(d)(2).

LEWIS, CANADY, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, J., dissents with an opinion, in which LABARGA, C. J,, and QUINCE, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 So. 3d 1220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/giordano-v-state-fla-2017.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack