Giordano v. Giordano

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Giordano v. Giordano

126 So. 2d 602

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 6, 1961·No. No. 59-720·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, husband, was granted a decree of divorce and the defendant and counterclaimant, wife, appealed. Each party charged the other with desertion. Because of the involved factual background which covered the actions of the parties during a thirty-year period, the case presents some difficulty. However, upon review, the ultimate question is whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the decree and we conclude that the evidence viewed in its most favorable light can be so construed. E.g., Schuberth v. Schuberth, Fla.1951, 52 So.2d 332; Monsalvatge v. Monsalvatge, 153 Fla. 763, 15 So.2d 838.

Affirmed.

HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, husband, was granted a decree of divorce and the defendant and counterclaimant, wife, appealed. Each party charged the other with desertion. Because of the involved factual background which covered the actions of the parties during a thirty-year period, the case presents some difficulty. However, upon review, the ultimate question is whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the decree and we conclude that the evidence viewed in its most favorable light can be so construed. E.g., Schuberth v. Schuberth, Fla.1951, 52 So.2d 332; Monsalvatge v. Monsalvatge, 153 Fla. 763, 15 So.2d 838.

Affirmed.

HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.

Giordano v. Giordano, 126 So. 2d 602 (Fla. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

126 So. 2d 602 (Giordano v. Giordano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related