Ginz v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Ginz v. State

44 Ind. 218

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Worden, J.

This was a prosecution against the appellant for selling intoxicating liquors in violation of the act of 1873. Conviction:

No question is involved in the case beyond such as were decided in the cases of Groesch v. The State, 42 Ind. 547, and Lehritter v. The State, 42 Ind. 383. For the reasons given in those cases, the judgment must be affirmed.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Worden, J.

This was a prosecution against the appellant for selling intoxicating liquors in violation of the act of 1873. Conviction:

No question is involved in the case beyond such as were decided in the cases of Groesch v. The State, 42 Ind. 547, and Lehritter v. The State, 42 Ind. 383. For the reasons given in those cases, the judgment must be affirmed.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

Ginz v. State, 44 Ind. 218 (Ind. 1873).

Pincite

44 Ind. 218 (Ginz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related