Ginsburg v. Gross

138 N.E.2d 270, 334 Mass. 709
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 8, 1956·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Exceptions overruled. This is an action of tort for personal injuries and property damage incurred in a collision of automobiles. The jury returned verdicts for the defendants. The plaintiff alleges exceptions relating to the charge and to the denial of his motion for a new trial. The bill of exceptions, which lacks a statement that it contains all the material evidence, is fatally defective. Irving v. Bonjorno, 327 Mass. 516, 518. Schnepel v. Kidd, 332 Mass. 137, 138. In fact, it contains no statement at all of any evidence. The plaintiff has not satisfied the burden resting upon the excepting party to show error. Posell v. Herscovitz, 237 Mass. 513, 517. Donahue v. Kenney, 330 Mass. 9, 12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ginsburg v. Gross, 138 N.E.2d 270, 334 Mass. 709 (Mass. 1956).

138 N.E.2d 270 (Ginsburg v. Gross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kurker v. National Grange Insurance
1988 Mass. App. Div. 182 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1988)
Comfort Air Systems, Inc. v. Cacopardo
346 N.E.2d 835 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1976)
Mendum v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
307 N.E.2d 16 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1974)
Donovan v. Mac-Gray Co.
265 N.E.2d 913 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1970)