Ginsburg v. Andron
This text of 222 A.D. 823 (Ginsburg v. Andron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The restrictive covenant constitutes an incumbrance which justified the vendees in rejecting the title. (Bull v. Burton, 227 N. Y. 101; Kimball Co. v. Fox, 120 Misc. 701; affd., 209 App. Div. 812; affd., 239 N. Y. 554; Isaacs v. Schmuck, 245 id. 77.) All other claims stated by the respondents upon the closing of the title as grounds of rejection seem to us to be insufficient, and we, therefore, reverse the findings and conclusions of law to such effect, and find appellants’ requests to find and conclusions of law in conformity with this view. Present — Kapper, Rich, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
222 A.D. 823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ginsburg-v-andron-nyappdiv-1928.