Ginsburg Development Companies v. Carbone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ginsburg Development Companies v. Carbone

100 A.D.3d 825, 953 N.Y.S.2d 895

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 21, 2012

StatusPublished

This text of 100 A.D.3d 825 (Ginsburg Development Companies v. Carbone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ginsburg Development Companies v. Carbone, 100 A.D.3d 825, 953 N.Y.S.2d 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the defendants appeal from so much an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.), entered April 12, 2011, as denied their cross motion to disqualify nonparties Jonathan E Vuotto and Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, LLE as counsel for the plaintiff in this action.

[826]*826Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants’ cross motion to disqualify Jonathan E Vuotto and his law firm, Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, LLP as counsel for the plaintiff in this action (see Light v Light, 64 AD3d 633, 635 [2009]; Hudson Val. Mar., Inc. v Town of Cortlandt, 54 AD3d 999, 1000-1001 [2008]; see also Magnus v Sklover, 95 AD3d 837, 838 [2012]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Hall and Roman, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the defendants appeal from so much an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.), entered April 12, 2011, as denied their cross motion to disqualify nonparties Jonathan E Vuotto and Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, LLE as counsel for the plaintiff in this action.

[826]*826Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants’ cross motion to disqualify Jonathan E Vuotto and his law firm, Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, LLP as counsel for the plaintiff in this action (see Light v Light, 64 AD3d 633, 635 [2009]; Hudson Val. Mar., Inc. v Town of Cortlandt, 54 AD3d 999, 1000-1001 [2008]; see also Magnus v Sklover, 95 AD3d 837, 838 [2012]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Hall and Roman, JJ, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.3d 825, 953 N.Y.S.2d 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ginsburg-development-companies-v-carbone-nyappdiv-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack