Ginsburg Development Companies v. Carbone

100 A.D.3d 825, 953 N.Y.S.2d 895

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the defendants appeal from so much an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.), entered April 12, 2011, as denied their cross motion to disqualify nonparties Jonathan E Vuotto and Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, LLE as counsel for the plaintiff in this action.

[826] Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants’ cross motion to disqualify Jonathan E Vuotto and his law firm, Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, LLP as counsel for the plaintiff in this action (see Light v Light, 64 AD3d 633, 635 [2009]; Hudson Val. Mar., Inc. v Town of Cortlandt, 54 AD3d 999, 1000-1001 [2008]; see also Magnus v Sklover, 95 AD3d 837, 838 [2012]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Hall and Roman, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ginsburg Development Companies v. Carbone, 100 A.D.3d 825, 953 N.Y.S.2d 895 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

100 A.D.3d 825 (Ginsburg Development Companies v. Carbone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hudson Valley Marine, Inc. v. Town of Cortlandt
54 A.D.3d 999 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Light v. Light
64 A.D.3d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Magnus v. Sklover
95 A.D.3d 837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)