Ginsberg v. Wolters

121 A. 730, 94 N.J. Eq. 532, 9 Stock. 532, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 702
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 19, 1923·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Poster.

[544] For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Then-chard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbach, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson—14.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ginsberg v. Wolters, 121 A. 730, 94 N.J. Eq. 532, 9 Stock. 532, 1923 N.J. LEXIS 702 (N.J. 1923).

121 A. 730 (Ginsberg v. Wolters) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kaufhold v. Cador Construction Co.
156 A. 125 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1931)
Luff v. Nevins
150 A. 834 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)
McKirgan v. Curtis
144 A. 454 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1929)
Kammerer v. Schuten
133 A. 483 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)