Ginsberg v. Solomon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ginsberg v. Solomon

651 So. 2d 183, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1716, 1995 WL 68806

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 22, 1995·No. No. 94-1850·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment under review as to possession of the real property in question, but reverse any finding of title in the appellees. We return this matter to the trial court for a trial on the issue of fraud in the execution of the document which purports to place title to the property in question in the appellee. See and compare Suris v. Tropical Fed. Savings & Loan Assoc., 515 So.2d 1049 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Forte v. Tripp & Skip, 339 So.2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment under review as to possession of the real property in question, but reverse any finding of title in the appellees. We return this matter to the trial court for a trial on the issue of fraud in the execution of the document which purports to place title to the property in question in the appellee. See and compare Suris v. Tropical Fed. Savings & Loan Assoc., 515 So.2d 1049 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Forte v. Tripp & Skip, 339 So.2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, with directions.

Ginsberg v. Solomon, 651 So. 2d 183, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1716, 1995 WL 68806 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

651 So. 2d 183 (Ginsberg v. Solomon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related