Ginsberg v. Levbourne Realty Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Ginsberg v. Levbourne Realty Co.

245 N.E.2d 810, 23 N.Y.2d 874, 298 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1619

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 15, 1969

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 N.E.2d 810 (Ginsberg v. Levbourne Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ginsberg v. Levbourne Realty Co., 245 N.E.2d 810, 23 N.Y.2d 874, 298 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1619 (N.Y. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed on the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

[876]*876Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Bergan and Breitel. Judges Burke, Keating and Jasen dissent and vote to affirm upon the ground that the jury was warranted in finding that defendant was negligent in failing to maintain the basketball court in a reasonably safe manner for the anticipated use of the resort hotel guests.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed on the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division.

[876]*876Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Bergan and Breitel. Judges Burke, Keating and Jasen dissent and vote to affirm upon the ground that the jury was warranted in finding that defendant was negligent in failing to maintain the basketball court in a reasonably safe manner for the anticipated use of the resort hotel guests.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 N.E.2d 810, 23 N.Y.2d 874, 298 N.Y.S.2d 80, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 1619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ginsberg-v-levbourne-realty-co-ny-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack