Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ginsberg v. Collins

Ginsberg v. Collins

523 So. 2d 736, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1421, 1988 WL 31812
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 13, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1911
StatusPublished

This text of 523 So. 2d 736 (Ginsberg v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ginsberg v. Collins, 523 So. 2d 736, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1421, 1988 WL 31812 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We believe the trial court was entitled to consider the documents attached to the appellant’s complaint in ruling on appellee’s motion to dismiss appellant’s claim for specific performance, and we find no error by the trial court in dismissing the claim for specific performance based on the contents of those documents. Farrell v. Phillips, 414 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); and Mintzberg v. Golenstaneh, 390 So.2d 759 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur. STONE, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farrell v. Phillips
414 So. 2d 1119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Mintzberg v. Golestaneh
390 So. 2d 759 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
523 So. 2d 736, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1421, 1988 WL 31812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ginsberg-v-collins-fladistctapp-1988.