Ginnegaw v. Corning

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ginnegaw v. Corning

92 N.Y.S. 1125

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 92 N.Y.S. 1125 (Ginnegaw v. Corning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ginnegaw v. Corning, 92 N.Y.S. 1125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless the appellant, on or before April 15, 1905, file and serve the printed papers on appeal, as provided by rule 41, in which event said motion is denied; and, in case said printed papers are not served and filed as above provided, upon filing due proof of such default the respondents may enter an order dismissing said appeal absolutely, with costs, without further notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless the appellant, on or before April 15, 1905, file and serve the printed papers on appeal, as provided by rule 41, in which event said motion is denied; and, in case said printed papers are not served and filed as above provided, upon filing due proof of such default the respondents may enter an order dismissing said appeal absolutely, with costs, without further notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 N.Y.S. 1125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ginnegaw-v-corning-nyappdiv-1905.