Gingras v. Russian Symphony Society

122 N.Y.S. 286
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedApril 8, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 122 N.Y.S. 286 (Gingras v. Russian Symphony Society) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gingras v. Russian Symphony Society, 122 N.Y.S. 286 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

SEABURY, J.

The defendant is a membership corporation organized under the laws of the state of New York. The plaintiff, a musician, has recovered judgment against it for services which he [287]*287alleged he rendered. The plaintiff proved that he was employed to render services by one Jacob Altschuler, and that Altschuler was vice president of the defendant. No evidence was offered to show that Altschuler acted on behalf of the defendant, or that he was duly authorized so to act. An examination of the record also shows that the plaintiff failed to prove any cause of action against the defendant.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

LEHMAN, J., concurs. GAVEGAN, J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Listemann v. Russian Symphony Society
125 N.Y.S. 1098 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 N.Y.S. 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gingras-v-russian-symphony-society-nyappterm-1910.