Ginger McCall v. Facebook, Inc.

709 F.3d 791
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 26, 2013·No. 10-16380, 10-16398·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

Order; Dissent to Order by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.

ORDER

Judges Hug and W. Fletcher have voted to deny appellants’ petitions for rehearing. Judge Kleinfeld has voted to grant the petitions for rehearing. Judge W. Fletcher has voted to deny the petitions for rehearing en banc and Judge Hug has so recommended. Judge Kleinfeld would grant the petitions for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on en banc rehearing. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused [793]*793active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petitions for rehearing and the petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED. Judge M. Smith’s dissent from the denial of en banc rehearing is filed concurrently herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ginger McCall v. Facebook, Inc., 709 F.3d 791 (9th Cir. 2013).

709 F.3d 791 (Ginger McCall v. Facebook, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boone v. Amazon Services, LLC
E.D. California, 2024
Jackson v. Fastenal Company
E.D. California, 2021
Rodriguez v. Danell Custom Harvesting, LLC
293 F. Supp. 3d 1117 (E.D. California, 2018)
Fraley v. Batman
638 F. App'x 594 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Jo Batman v. Facebook, Inc.
Ninth Circuit, 2016
Marek v. Lane
134 S. Ct. 8 (Supreme Court, 2013)