Ginger Manos, M. D. v. Coastal Vascular etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ginger Manos, M. D. v. Coastal Vascular etc.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 2, 2015

Docket14-4329

StatusPublished

This text of Ginger Manos, M. D. v. Coastal Vascular etc. (Ginger Manos, M. D. v. Coastal Vascular etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ginger Manos, M. D. v. Coastal Vascular etc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

GINGER MANOS, M. D., NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D14-4329

COASTAL VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL, PLLC., AND LIFELINE VASCULAR CENTER NICEVILLE, LLC.,

Appellees.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Ross Goodman, Judge.

Ginger Barry Boyd of Broad and Cassel, Destin, for Appellant.

Jeremy C. Branning, Daniel E. Harrell, and James R. Green, Jr., of Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond & Stackhouse, Pensacola, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order granting appellees’ motion for temporary

injunction. Appellant’s claim that the injunction is overbroad is not preserved because it was raised for the first time on appeal. However, our affirmance is

without prejudice to appellant raising this claim before the trial court.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI