Gingell v. Panichelli
This text of Gingell v. Panichelli (Gingell v. Panichelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
JENNIFER GINGELL,
Appellant,
v.
MICHELLE PANICHELLI,
Appellee.
No. 2D2025-2266
May 27, 2026
Appeal from the County Court for Pasco County; Knute J. Nathe, Judge.
Jennifer Gingell, pro se.
No appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) ("Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal. The trial court should have been affirmed because the record brought forward by the appellant is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error."). LaROSE, LABRIT, and GUARD, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gingell v. Panichelli, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gingell-v-panichelli-fladistctapp-2026.