Gines v. Skyjack, Inc.
This text of Gines v. Skyjack, Inc. (Gines v. Skyjack, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
TRESEAN GINES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 22-cv-840-DWD ) SKYJACK, INC., ) UNITED RENTALS (NORTH ) AMERICA), INC., ) LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, LLC, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) ) SKYJACK, INC., ) ) Third-Party Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) RELIABLE RELAMPING, INC., ) ) Third-Party Defendant. )
ORDER
DUGAN, District Judge:
Now before the Court is Third-Party Defendant Reliable Relamping Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss and for Finding of Good Faith Settlement (Doc. 103). Following a hearing, due notice having been given, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The Motion to Dismiss and Finding of Good Faith Settlement (Doc. 103) is GRANTED; 2. Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Skyjack Inc.’s Third-Party Complaint for Contribution against Third-Party Defendant Reliable Relamping, Inc. (Doc. 73)
is DISMISSED, with prejudice; 3. Third-Party Defendant Reliable Relamping, Inc. is DISMISSED, with prejudice, from this matter; 4. The Court expressly FINDS that the settlement between Plaintiff Tresean Gines and Third-Party Defendant Reliable Relamping, Inc. is made in good faith pursuant to the Illinois Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Act, 740 Ill. Comp.
Stat. Ann. 100/0.01, et seq.; and 5. Any and all claims for contribution by any named or potential tortfeasors pursuant to the Illinois Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Act, 740 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 100/0.01, et seq., as to Third-Party Defendant Reliable Relamping, Inc. are barred.
In addition to the Motion to Dismiss, on February 17, 2023, Third-Party Plaintiff Skyjack, Inc. and Defendant Third-Party Defendant Reliable Relamping, Inc. executed a Stipulation of Dismissal (Doc. 104). Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A) permits dismissal without a court order by two methods: (i) plaintiffs file a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) the plaintiff files
a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. In the instant case, Third-Party Plaintiff Skyjack, Inc. has filed a notice of dismissal signed by all third parties. Given the procedural posture of the case, this stipulation would have effected the dismissal of the case without further action from the Court. Nat'l Inspection & Repairs, Inc. v. George S. May Int'l Co., 600 F.3d 878, 883 (7th Cir. 2010) ("Claims dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) are complete on the dismissal without any action by the district judge.”). However, in considering the above findings, the Motion to Dismiss and Stipulation effected the dismissal of this suit with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment and to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: April 13, 2023
DAVID W. DUGAN United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gines v. Skyjack, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gines-v-skyjack-inc-ilsd-2023.