Gine v. Hobbs

409 So. 2d 199, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29226
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 1982·No. No. 81-459·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Preger v. Gomory, 55 So.2d 541 (Fla.1951); Evans v. Southern Holding Corp., 391 So.2d 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), review denied, 399 So.2d 1142 (Fla.1981); Pope v. Cruise Boat Co., 380 So.2d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Holliman v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., 349 So.2d 751 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Shephard v. Azzarelli Construction Co., 294 So.2d 667 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gine v. Hobbs, 409 So. 2d 199, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 29226 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

409 So. 2d 199 (Gine v. Hobbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maqueira v. Almas
409 So. 2d 199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)