Gindell v. Burgard

525 So. 2d 497, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1247, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2147, 1988 WL 50924
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 25, 1988
DocketNo. 87-0477
StatusPublished

This text of 525 So. 2d 497 (Gindell v. Burgard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gindell v. Burgard, 525 So. 2d 497, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1247, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2147, 1988 WL 50924 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We find no error by the trial court and specifically believe that there was sufficient ambiguity on the face of the deed in question to permit the trial court to consider extrinsic evidence to determine the intent of the grantor.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
525 So. 2d 497, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1247, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 2147, 1988 WL 50924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gindell-v-burgard-fladistctapp-1988.