Gincel v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gincel v. Cohen

167 A.D. 918

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 167 A.D. 918 (Gincel v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gincel v. Cohen, 167 A.D. 918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

As the contract was made in Sullivan county and was to be there performed, and as the plaintiff’s assignor therein described himself as a resident of Sullivan county, we think that county is the proper place for the trial. The order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

As the contract was made in Sullivan county and was to be there performed, and as the plaintiff’s assignor therein described himself as a resident of Sullivan county, we think that county is the proper place for the trial. The order appealed from must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 A.D. 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gincel-v-cohen-nyappdiv-1915.