Gina Youngblood v. County of Los Angeles

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedSeptember 18, 2025
Docket2:25-cv-04413
StatusUnknown

This text of Gina Youngblood v. County of Los Angeles (Gina Youngblood v. County of Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gina Youngblood v. County of Los Angeles, (C.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - 3 WESTERN DIVISION 4 5 GINA YOUNGBLOOD, EUGENIA CASE NO. 2:25-cv-04413-WLH (MBK) YOUNGBLOOD, JANEL [Assigned to Hon. Wesley L. Hsu, Dept. 9B1 6 HERNDERSON, and JAMIE 7 HENDERSON, INDIVIDUALLY DISCOVERY MATTER AND AS SUCCESSORS IN 8 INTEREST TO EUGENE [PROPOSED] STIPULATED 9 YOUNGBLOOD, DECEASED, PROTECTIVE ORDER 10 Plaintiffs, 11 Complaint Filed: 05/16/2025 VS. Trial Date: None 12 13 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, and DOES 1-10, 14 15 Defendants. 16 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 17 Procedure 26(cc), Plaintiffs Gina Youngblood, Eugenia Youngblood, Janel Henderson, and Jamie Henderson and Defendant County of Los Angeles (collectively, the Parties) 18 19 hereby stipulate to, and move the Court to enter, this Protective Order', on the grounds that the discovery sought is highly sensitive. 20 21 1. GENERAL 22 1.1 Purposes and Limitations Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 23 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 24 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 25 Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following 26 Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does 27 28 1 This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on the motel protective order published and used throughout the Central District. 1 1 not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the 2 protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited 3 information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal 4 principles. The Parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this 5 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under 6 seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the 7 standards that will be applied when a Party seeks permission from the court to file material 8 under seal. 9 1.2 Good Cause Statement 10 This action involves the County of Los Angeles and peace officers employed by 11 Los Angeles Sheriff Department. Plaintiff will seek materials and information the 12 County of Los Angeles ("County") maintains as confidential, such as personnel files of 13 the officers involved in the Incident, Internal Affairs materials and information, video 14 recordings, local criminal history information, body work camera footage, criminal 15 investigative files, and other administrative materials and other information that the 16 County believes needs special protection from public disclosure and from use for any 17 purpose other than prosecuting this litigation is warranted. Such confidential and 18 proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, confidential 19 business, information regarding confidential business practices, or other confidential 20 commercial information (including information implicating privacy rights of third 21 Parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be 22 privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court 23 rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, 24 to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, 25 to adequately protect information the Parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure 26 that the Parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation 27 for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and 28 serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such 1 information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the Parties that information will 2 not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated 3 without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public 4 manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this 5 case. 6 2. DEFINITIONS 7 2.1 Action: Gina Youngblood, et al., v. County of Los Angeles, et al. 8 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation 9 of information or items under this Order. 10 2.3 "CONFIDENTIAL" Information or Items: information (regardless of 11 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection 12 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good 13 Cause Statement. 14 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their 15 support staff). 16 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 17 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 18 "CONFIDENTIAL." 19 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of 20 the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 21 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 22 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 23 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 24 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an 25 expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 26 /// 27 //I 28 1 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party to this Action. 2 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 3 counsel. 4 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 5 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 6 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a Party to 7 this Action but are retained to represent or advise a Party to this Action and have 8 appeared in this Action on behalf of that Party or are affiliated with a law firm that has 9 appeared on behalf of that Party, including support staff. 10 2.11 Party: any Party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 11 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 12 support staffs). 13 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 14 Discovery Material in this Action. 15 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 16 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 17 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and 18 their employees and subcontractors. 19 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated 20 as "CONFIDENTIAL." 21 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 22 from a Producing Party. 23 3. SCOPE 24 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected 25 Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from 26 Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected 27 Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel 28 that might reveal Protected Material. 4 1 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial 2 judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 3 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1013
California CCP § 1013(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gina Youngblood v. County of Los Angeles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gina-youngblood-v-county-of-los-angeles-cacd-2025.