Gina S. v. Board of Education of Carmel Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gina S. v. Board of Education of Carmel Central School District

199 A.D.2d 491, 608 N.Y.S.2d 116

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 27, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 199 A.D.2d 491 (Gina S. v. Board of Education of Carmel Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gina S. v. Board of Education of Carmel Central School District, 199 A.D.2d 491, 608 N.Y.S.2d 116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for loss of the services and companionship of the infant plaintiff, the defendant Jeffrey Miller appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Dickinson, J.), dated June 19, 1991, as denied his motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216 and extended the plaintiffs’ time to file a note of issue and certificate of readiness.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements (see, Amy L. M. v Board of Educ., 199 AD2d 477 [No. 25] [decided herewith]). Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for loss of the services and companionship of the infant plaintiff, the defendant Jeffrey Miller appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Dickinson, J.), dated June 19, 1991, as denied his motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216 and extended the plaintiffs’ time to file a note of issue and certificate of readiness.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements (see, Amy L. M. v Board of Educ., 199 AD2d 477 [No. 25] [decided herewith]). Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 491, 608 N.Y.S.2d 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gina-s-v-board-of-education-of-carmel-central-school-district-nyappdiv-1993.