Gimeno v. Rivera

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gimeno v. Rivera

153 So. 3d 390, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20421, 2014 WL 7156964

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 17, 2014

Docket14-0774

StatusPublished

This text of 153 So. 3d 390 (Gimeno v. Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gimeno v. Rivera, 153 So. 3d 390, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20421, 2014 WL 7156964 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

SHEPHERD, C.J.

This is an appeal by Gracia Gim-eno from a downward modification of Nal-tan Rivera’s child support obligation in a post-paternity modification proceeding, based upon the fact that Rivera has fathered three more children by another woman after having fathered a child with Gimeno. It is settled law that a party moving for a downward modification of child support has the burden of proving (1) a substantial change of circumstances, (2) not contemplated at the time of the final judgment of dissolution or, as in this case, an order determining paternity, (3) that is sufficient, material, involuntary, and permanent in nature. Overbey v. Overbey, 698 So.2d 811, 814 (Fla.1997); Burkley v. Burkley, 911 So.2d 262, 268 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Laliberte v. Laliberte, 698 So.2d 1291, 1293 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Begetting a child is not an involuntary act. Absent some special circumstance, the presence of subsequent children will not justify a deviation from child support guidelines. See § 61.12(b), Fla. Stat. (2013); State, Dep’t of Revenue v. Feeney, 689 So.2d 350, 351-352 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Robinson v. Robinson, 657 So.2d 958, 960 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). 1

For the foregoing reason, we reverse the order of the trial court and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

1

. Upward modifications of child support are treated differently. See § 61.12(b), Fla. Stat. (2013); Pohlmann v. Pohlmann, 703 So.2d 1121,1124 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHEPHERD, C.J.

This is an appeal by Gracia Gim-eno from a downward modification of Nal-tan Rivera’s child support obligation in a post-paternity modification proceeding, based upon the fact that Rivera has fathered three more children by another woman after having fathered a child with Gimeno. It is settled law that a party moving for a downward modification of child support has the burden of proving (1) a substantial change of circumstances, (2) not contemplated at the time of the final judgment of dissolution or, as in this case, an order determining paternity, (3) that is sufficient, material, involuntary, and permanent in nature. Overbey v. Overbey, 698 So.2d 811, 814 (Fla.1997); Burkley v. Burkley, 911 So.2d 262, 268 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); Laliberte v. Laliberte, 698 So.2d 1291, 1293 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Begetting a child is not an involuntary act. Absent some special circumstance, the presence of subsequent children will not justify a deviation from child support guidelines. See § 61.12(b), Fla. Stat. (2013); State, Dep’t of Revenue v. Feeney, 689 So.2d 350, 351-352 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Robinson v. Robinson, 657 So.2d 958, 960 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). 1

For the foregoing reason, we reverse the order of the trial court and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

1

. Upward modifications of child support are treated differently. See § 61.12(b), Fla. Stat. (2013); Pohlmann v. Pohlmann, 703 So.2d 1121,1124 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

153 So. 3d 390, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 20421, 2014 WL 7156964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gimeno-v-rivera-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack