Gimenez v. Barry

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gimenez v. Barry

572 So. 2d 35, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 91, 1991 WL 686

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 8, 1991·No. No. 90-958·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the conclusory affidavit submitted by defendants in support of their motion for summary judgment failed to demonstrate the absence of genuine issues of material fact, Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); North Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Royster, 544 So.2d 1131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Gruber v. Mount Sinai Hosp. of Greater Miami, Inc., 487 So.2d 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Brooks v. Serrano, 209 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), we reverse the final summary judgment.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the conclusory affidavit submitted by defendants in support of their motion for summary judgment failed to demonstrate the absence of genuine issues of material fact, Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); North Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Royster, 544 So.2d 1131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Gruber v. Mount Sinai Hosp. of Greater Miami, Inc., 487 So.2d 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Brooks v. Serrano, 209 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), we reverse the final summary judgment.

Reversed and remanded.

Gimenez v. Barry, 572 So. 2d 35, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 91, 1991 WL 686 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

572 So. 2d 35 (Gimenez v. Barry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related