Gimenez v. Barry

572 So. 2d 35, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 91, 1991 WL 686
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 8, 1991
DocketNo. 90-958
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 572 So. 2d 35 (Gimenez v. Barry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gimenez v. Barry, 572 So. 2d 35, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 91, 1991 WL 686 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the conclusory affidavit submitted by defendants in support of their motion for summary judgment failed to demonstrate the absence of genuine issues of material fact, Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); North Broward Hosp. Dist. v. Royster, 544 So.2d 1131 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Gruber v. Mount Sinai Hosp. of Greater Miami, Inc., 487 So.2d 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Brooks v. Serrano, 209 So.2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), we reverse the final summary judgment.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verchick v. HECHT INVESTMENTS, LTD.
924 So. 2d 944 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
572 So. 2d 35, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 91, 1991 WL 686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gimenez-v-barry-fladistctapp-1991.