Gimble v. Goode
This text of 13 La. Ann. 352 (Gimble v. Goode) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The money due the minor in the case at bar must be paid to the plaintiff as natural tutrix of her minor child, and she is not therefore compelled to furnish security, as in the case where she would have the usufruct, if she were still a widow.
It is, therefore, ordered, adjuged and decreed, that the judgment be avoided and reversed, and that plaintiff, as natural tutrix of her minor child, Lina, recover of F. S. Goode, administrator of the estate of Michel Gimble, deceased, one thousand dollars, for the use and benefit of said minor child, to be paid in preference to all other debts, except those for the vendor’s privilege and expenses incurred in selling the property ; it is further ordered, that said F. 8. Goode, administrator, place plaintiff, as-natural tutrix of her said child, on tho tableau of his administration, for said thousand dollars, with privilege as aforesaid, and that he pay the same in due course of administration.
It is further ordered, that tho costs of both courts in this proceeding be paid by the estate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 La. Ann. 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gimble-v-goode-la-1858.