Home/U.S. Customs Court/Gimbel Bros. v. United States

Gimbel Bros. v. United States

58 Cust. Ct. 865, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1972
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 14, 1967
DocketNo. P67/35; protest 66/535 (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 865 (Gimbel Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gimbel Bros. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 865, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1972 (cusc 1967).

Opinion

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., and J. J. Murphey & Co. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177) and United States v. M. & D. Miller, Inc. (41 CCPA 226, C.A.D. 556), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 216 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Cust. Ct. 865, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gimbel-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1967.