Gimbel Bros. v. United States
58 Cust. Ct. 865, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1972
United States Customs Court·Decided February 14, 1967·No. No. P67/35; protest 66/535 (New York)·Published
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., and J. J. Murphey & Co. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177) and United States v. M. & D. Miller, Inc. (41 CCPA 226, C.A.D. 556), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gimbel Bros. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 865, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1972 (cusc 1967).
58 Cust. Ct. 865 (Gimbel Bros. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 216 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)