Home/U.S. Customs Court/Gimbel Bros. v. United States

Gimbel Bros. v. United States

50 Cust. Ct. 292, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3817
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gimbel Bros. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 48 Cust. Ct. 18 →
United States Customs Court·Decided May 7, 1963·No. No. 67696; protest 62/3979 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., et al. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gimbel Bros. v. United States, 50 Cust. Ct. 292, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3817 (cusc 1963).

50 Cust. Ct. 292 (Gimbel Bros. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United States
44 Cust. Ct. 216 (U.S. Customs Court, 1960)