Gimbel Bros. v. United States

18 Cust. Ct. 304, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 385
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 14, 1947
DocketNo. 6763; Entry No. 770974/1, etc.
StatusPublished

This text of 18 Cust. Ct. 304 (Gimbel Bros. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gimbel Bros. v. United States, 18 Cust. Ct. 304, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 385 (cusc 1947).

Opinion

Cole, Judge (Abstract):

These appeals for reappraisement of various items of merchandise concern the so-called British purchase tax, described in the law of the United Kingdom entitled, “Finance (No. 2) Act 1940 3 & 4 Geo. 6 Ch. 48.” [305]*305The said tax was held not to be an item to be included in foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)). United States v. Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp., 33 C. C. P. A. 183, C. A. D. 334.

An agreed set of facts shows export value', section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the instant merchandise, and that such statutory values for the articles in question are the appraised values less additions made by the importer on entry because of advances in similar eases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1402
19 U.S.C. § 1402(c)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Cust. Ct. 304, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gimbel-bros-v-united-states-cusc-1947.