Gimbel Bros. v. Lee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gimbel Bros. v. Lee

66 A.D.2d 873, 411 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14217

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 66 A.D.2d 873 (Gimbel Bros. v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gimbel Bros. v. Lee, 66 A.D.2d 873, 411 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14217 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 23,1978, which denied its motion to strike the defendant’s note of issue and statement of readiness or, alternatively, to strike the notice for preference for trial. Order modified by adding thereto a provision granting plaintiff leave to depose defendant. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The examination shall proceed at a time and place to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days to be given by plaintiff, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. The plaintiff should be permitted to conduct an examination before trial of the defendant. However, the action should retain its position on the Trial Calendar. Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 23,1978, which denied its motion to strike the defendant’s note of issue and statement of readiness or, alternatively, to strike the notice for preference for trial. Order modified by adding thereto a provision granting plaintiff leave to depose defendant. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The examination shall proceed at a time and place to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days to be given by plaintiff, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. The plaintiff should be permitted to conduct an examination before trial of the defendant. However, the action should retain its position on the Trial Calendar. Shapiro, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 A.D.2d 873, 411 N.Y.S.2d 879, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gimbel-bros-v-lee-nyappdiv-1978.