Gimbel Bros., Inc. v. United States
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United States (39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the items of merchandise marked with the letter “A” or “B” were held dutiable respectively as follows: (a) As to the items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to May 28, 1950, at 20 percent under paragraph 1547(a) ; and (b) as to items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after May 28,1950, at 10 percent under said paragraph 1547(a), as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52476).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
44 Cust. Ct. 321 (Gimbel Bros., Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.