Gilyard v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail

Fourth Circuit

Gilyard v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail

463 F. App'x 200

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 2, 2012·No. No. 11-7010·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shanda L. Gilyard appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gilyard v. W. Tidewater Reg’l Jail, No. 2:11-cv-00189-MSD-FBS (E.D. Va. filed July 11, 2011 & entered July 13, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shanda L. Gilyard appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gilyard v. W. Tidewater Reg’l Jail, No. 2:11-cv-00189-MSD-FBS (E.D. Va. filed July 11, 2011 & entered July 13, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Gilyard v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail, 463 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

463 F. App'x 200 (Gilyard v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related