Gilyard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gilyard v. State

718 So. 2d 888, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11410, 1998 WL 568115

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gilyard v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 675 So. 2d 950 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 9, 1998·No. No. 97-4575·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lamontique Lavell Gilyard appeals his conviction for attempted second degree murder. Gilyard argues that the rationale of State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995), should be extended to preclude conviction of that crime. We reject that argument under the authority of Gentry v. State, 437 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1983). See also Galdamez v. State, 713 So.2d 1128 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Quesenberry v. State, 711 So.2d 1359 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Pitts v. State, 710 So.2d 62, 62-63 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); and Watkins v. State, 705 So.2d 938, 939 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., DAVIS, J., and SHIVERS, DOUGLASS B., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lamontique Lavell Gilyard appeals his conviction for attempted second degree murder. Gilyard argues that the rationale of State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995), should be extended to preclude conviction of that crime. We reject that argument under the authority of Gentry v. State, 437 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1983). See also Galdamez v. State, 713 So.2d 1128 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Quesenberry v. State, 711 So.2d 1359 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Pitts v. State, 710 So.2d 62, 62-63 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); and Watkins v. State, 705 So.2d 938, 939 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., DAVIS, J., and SHIVERS, DOUGLASS B., Senior Judge, concur.

Gilyard v. State, 718 So. 2d 888, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11410, 1998 WL 568115 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

718 So. 2d 888 (Gilyard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related