Gilyard v. State
This text of 718 So. 2d 888 (Gilyard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Lamontique Lavell Gilyard appeals his conviction for attempted second degree murder. Gilyard argues that the rationale of State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995), should be extended to preclude conviction of that crime. We reject that argument under the authority of Gentry v. State, 437 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1983). See also Galdamez v. State, 713 So.2d 1128 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Quesenberry v. State, 711 So.2d 1359 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Pitts v. State, 710 So.2d 62, 62-63 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); and Watkins v. State, 705 So.2d 938, 939 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
718 So. 2d 888, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11410, 1998 WL 568115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilyard-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.