Gilyard v. McNamara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gilyard v. McNamara

276 A.D.2d 745, 715 N.Y.S.2d 332, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10919

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 276 A.D.2d 745 (Gilyard v. McNamara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilyard v. McNamara, 276 A.D.2d 745, 715 N.Y.S.2d 332, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10919 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated December 20, 1999, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant’s motion papers failed to establish a prima facie case that the plaintiffs injuries were not serious within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Mendola v Demetres, 212 AD2d 515). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated December 20, 1999, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant’s motion papers failed to establish a prima facie case that the plaintiffs injuries were not serious within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Mendola v Demetres, 212 AD2d 515). Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 A.D.2d 745, 715 N.Y.S.2d 332, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilyard-v-mcnamara-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack