Gilvary v. Cuyahoga Valley Ry. Co.
188 N.E. 4, 127 Ohio St. 402, 127 Ohio St. (N.S.) 402, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 292
This text of 188 N.E. 4 (Gilvary v. Cuyahoga Valley Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gilvary v. Cuyahoga Valley Ry. Co., 188 N.E. 4, 127 Ohio St. 402, 127 Ohio St. (N.S.) 402, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 292 (Ohio 1933).
Opinion
It appearing that the judges of the court are equally divided in opinion as to the merits of this ease (one judge not participating) and are for that reason unable to agree upon a judgment, and the entry of that fact constituting an affirmance of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, it is ordered that said judgment be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tipton v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
78 F.2d 450 (Ninth Circuit, 1935)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
188 N.E. 4, 127 Ohio St. 402, 127 Ohio St. (N.S.) 402, 1933 Ohio LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilvary-v-cuyahoga-valley-ry-co-ohio-1933.