Gilstrap v. Standard Oil Co.
This text of 108 F.2d 736 (Gilstrap v. Standard Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In these cases the trial court sustained motions to dismiss upon the ground that no substantial federal question was presented by the respective complaints. The action of the trial court was correct. Foster & Kleiser Co. v. Special Site Sign Co., 9 Cir., 85 F.2d 742; Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma, 286 U.S. 210, 234, 52 S.Ct. 559, 76 L.Ed. 1062, 86 A.L.R. 403; Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin, 289 U.S. 103, 53 S. Ct. 549, 77 L.Ed. 1062.
The respective judgments are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 F.2d 736, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilstrap-v-standard-oil-co-ca9-1940.