Gilson Quartz Mining Co. v. Gilson

47 Cal. 597
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1874·No. No. 3,970·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

1. The plaintiff having been nonsuited at the trial on July 11th, the “findings of fact and conclusions of law,” filed on the twenty-sixth of July, are without precedent in point of practice.

2. The Court manifestly erred in nonsuiting the plaintiff, who was not bound to return to the defendants the moneys received of them in part satisfaction of the judgment, for the plaintiff is entitled to retain these moneys in any aspect of the case.

[602]*602Nor does it concern the defendants what disposition has been made of the Kenfield stock. If it had been returned to Kenfield, it would not have benefited the defendants in anywise.-

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial. Bemittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilson Quartz Mining Co. v. Gilson, 47 Cal. 597 (Cal. 1874).

47 Cal. 597 (Gilson Quartz Mining Co. v. Gilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

M. G. Chamberlain & Co. v. Simpson
343 P.2d 438 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)
King v. Mortimer
233 P.2d 4 (California Supreme Court, 1951)
Sime v. Malouf
212 P.2d 946 (California Court of Appeal, 1949)
Campbell v. Birch
122 P.2d 902 (California Supreme Court, 1942)
Shaffer v. Security Trust & Savings Bank
41 P.2d 948 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Winstanley v. Ackerman
294 P. 449 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)
Taylor v. Hopper
276 P. 990 (California Supreme Court, 1929)
Colver v. W. B. Scarborough Co.
238 P. 1096 (California Court of Appeal, 1925)
Willamette Box & Lumber Co. v. Wheeler
202 P. 714 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1921)
Westerfeld v. New York Life Insurance
58 P. 92 (California Supreme Court, 1900)
Richards v. Fraser
55 P. 246 (California Supreme Court, 1898)