Gilroy v. Twelfth Ward Bank

125 N.Y.S. 1121
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1910
StatusPublished

This text of 125 N.Y.S. 1121 (Gilroy v. Twelfth Ward Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gilroy v. Twelfth Ward Bank, 125 N.Y.S. 1121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no merit whatever in this appeal. The opinion of this court on the appeal from the' order (51 Misc. Rep. 62, 99 N. Y. Supp. 908) shows that the order could not have adjudicated the issues in this case. It appears from the computation of interest made by the witness was erroneous to the extent of 85 cents. The defendant should have corrected this trivial erroV at the time. It now contends that the judgment should be modified to that extent, and, as the respondent joins in the request, the judgment will be so modified. The judgment is therefore reduced by deducting therefrom 85 cents, and, as modified, affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Twelfth Ward Bank v. Columbia Publishing Co.
51 Misc. 62 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 N.Y.S. 1121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilroy-v-twelfth-ward-bank-nyappterm-1910.