Gilroy v. Twelfth Ward Bank

125 N.Y.S. 1121
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided October 15, 1910·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is no merit whatever in this appeal. The opinion of this court on the appeal from the' order (51 Misc. Rep. 62, 99 N. Y. Supp. 908) shows that the order could not have adjudicated the issues in this case. It appears from the computation of interest made by the witness was erroneous to the extent of 85 cents. The defendant should have corrected this trivial erroV at the time. It now contends that the judgment should be modified to that extent, and, as the respondent joins in the request, the judgment will be so modified. The judgment is therefore reduced by deducting therefrom 85 cents, and, as modified, affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilroy v. Twelfth Ward Bank, 125 N.Y.S. 1121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

125 N.Y.S. 1121 (Gilroy v. Twelfth Ward Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Twelfth Ward Bank v. Columbia Publishing Co.
51 Misc. 62 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)