Gilroy v. American Broadcasting Co.

47 A.D.2d 728, 365 N.Y.S.2d 193, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8981
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 6, 1975·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on January 28, 1972, in favor of plaintiff, after a jury trial, unanimously modified on the law and on the facts, to the extent of remanding the matter for a new trial only on the issue of damages, including punitive damages, if any, and otherwise affirmed. Plaintiff-appellant-respondent shall recover of defendants-respondents-appellants one bill of $60 costs and disbursements of these cross appeals. The trial court erred in excluding the testimony offered by plaintiff and his expert witness, by which plaintiff sought to establish the reasonable value of the literary character created by him and misappropriated by defendants and in limiting plaintiff’s recovery to defendants’ profits. The proper measure of damages flowing from defendants’ wrongful appropriation of plaintiff’s literary property is the reasonable value thereof and Opinion evidence of the value of the property” is admissible. (Bobbins v. Frank Cooper Assoc., 14 N Y 2d 913, 915.) Concur — Stevens, J. P., Lupiano, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilroy v. American Broadcasting Co., 47 A.D.2d 728, 365 N.Y.S.2d 193, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8981 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

47 A.D.2d 728 (Gilroy v. American Broadcasting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rubenstein v. Mayor
2018 NY Slip Op 3865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Design Innovation, Inc. v. Fisher-Price, Inc.
463 F. Supp. 2d 177 (D. Connecticut, 2006)
Schonfeld v. Hilliard
218 F.3d 164 (Second Circuit, 2000)
Dicini, Inc. v. William Hengerer Co.
171 A.D.2d 515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)