Gilrane v. Christine
This text of 230 A.D. 787 (Gilrane v. Christine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. The plaintiff’s evidence presented, prima facie, a question of fact, which should have been submitted to the jury, as to whether or not the respondent was negligent in continuing in its employment and permitting on its premises a person of reckless and mischievous disposition. (Hall v. Smathers, 240 N. Y. 486-489; Swinarton v. Le Boutillier, 7 Misc. 639; affd., 148 N. Y. 752.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D. 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilrane-v-christine-nyappdiv-1930.