Gilpin v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gilpin v. State

296 S.W.3d 485, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1087, 2009 WL 2223060

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 28, 2009

DocketWD 70078

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 296 S.W.3d 485 (Gilpin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilpin v. State, 296 S.W.3d 485, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1087, 2009 WL 2223060 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Gilpin appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He sought to vacate his conviction for stealing, section 570.030, RSMo Cum.Supp.2008, and sentence of five years imprisonment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Gilpin appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. He sought to vacate his conviction for stealing, section 570.030, RSMo Cum.Supp.2008, and sentence of five years imprisonment. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 S.W.3d 485, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1087, 2009 WL 2223060, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilpin-v-state-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack