Gilpin v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gilpin v. Smith

71 S.E. 944, 9 Ga. App. 583, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 241

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedAugust 4, 1911

Docket2872

StatusPublished

This text of 71 S.E. 944 (Gilpin v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilpin v. Smith, 71 S.E. 944, 9 Ga. App. 583, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 241 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. The evidence on.the main point involved (that is, as to whether the defendant bought the property with’ actual notice) was in such conflict as to make the finding of the jury, approved by the trial judge, conclusive upon this court.

2. Although a paper is signed by mark, and is neither attested nor re-. corded, it is admissible in evidence when its execution is directly proved by one who saw it signed. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

1. The evidence on.the main point involved (that is, as to whether the defendant bought the property with’ actual notice) was in such conflict as to make the finding of the jury, approved by the trial judge, conclusive upon this court.

2. Although a paper is signed by mark, and is neither attested nor re-. corded, it is admissible in evidence when its execution is directly proved by one who saw it signed. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 S.E. 944, 9 Ga. App. 583, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilpin-v-smith-gactapp-1911.