Gilpin v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gilpin v. Smith

71 S.E. 944, 9 Ga. App. 583, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 241

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 4, 1911·No. 2872·Published

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. The evidence on.the main point involved (that is, as to whether the defendant bought the property with’ actual notice) was in such conflict as to make the finding of the jury, approved by the trial judge, conclusive upon this court.

2. Although a paper is signed by mark, and is neither attested nor re-. corded, it is admissible in evidence when its execution is directly proved by one who saw it signed. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

1. The evidence on.the main point involved (that is, as to whether the defendant bought the property with’ actual notice) was in such conflict as to make the finding of the jury, approved by the trial judge, conclusive upon this court.

2. Although a paper is signed by mark, and is neither attested nor re-. corded, it is admissible in evidence when its execution is directly proved by one who saw it signed. Judgment affirmed.

Gilpin v. Smith, 71 S.E. 944, 9 Ga. App. 583, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 241 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

71 S.E. 944 (Gilpin v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.