Gilmour v. Manhattan Center, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gilmour v. Manhattan Center, Inc.

23 A.D.2d 782, 259 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4402

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.2d 782 (Gilmour v. Manhattan Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilmour v. Manhattan Center, Inc., 23 A.D.2d 782, 259 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4402 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a wife and her husband to recover damages for personal injury, loss of services, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 18, 1964 upon reconsideration, which adhered to the court’s original decision and denied their application for a preference in trial pursuant to this court’s special rules. Order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, on the basis of the medical proof submitted, the court properly exercised its discretion in denying the preference (Peisachov v. La Barbera, 18 A D 2d 681; Scmtopatre v. Lieberman, 18 A D 2d 1021). Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a wife and her husband to recover damages for personal injury, loss of services, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 18, 1964 upon reconsideration, which adhered to the court’s original decision and denied their application for a preference in trial pursuant to this court’s special rules. Order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, on the basis of the medical proof submitted, the court properly exercised its discretion in denying the preference (Peisachov v. La Barbera, 18 A D 2d 681; Scmtopatre v. Lieberman, 18 A D 2d 1021). Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.2d 782, 259 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilmour-v-manhattan-center-inc-nyappdiv-1965.