Gilmore v. Utah

429 U.S. 989, 97 S. Ct. 515
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 3, 1976·No. No. A-453·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

State of Utah is requested to file prior to 5 p.m., e.s.t., Tuesday, December 7, 1976, a response to application for stay of execution filed December 2, 1976, particularly with respect to the allegations of said application bearing upon the validity of Gary Mark Gilmore’s waiver of his right to appeal, and to file with said response, unless impossible or wholly impractical, a transcript of the hearing held on November 1, 1976, on the motion for a new trial, a transcript of the proceedings of November 10, 1976, before the Utah Supreme Court, a transcript of the proceedings before the Board of Pardons on November 30, 1976, and a transcript of the proceedings of December 1, 1976, before the sentencing judgment at which a date for execution of the sentence was set. The State’s response may be filed separately from and prior to the filing of the transcripts should the State care to do so. Application for stay of execution granted pending filing of said response and further action of the Court on the application for stay.

The Chief (Jtjstice, Mr. Justice Rehnquist, and Mr. Justice Stevens would deny the stay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilmore v. Utah, 429 U.S. 989, 97 S. Ct. 515 (1976).

429 U.S. 989 (Gilmore v. Utah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pernell Ford v. Michael W. Haley
195 F.3d 603 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
Southview Associates, Ltd. v. Bongartz
980 F.2d 84 (Second Circuit, 1992)
Bung's Bar & Grille, Inc. v. TP. COUNCIL OF FLORENCE
502 A.2d 1198 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
Holaway v. City of Pipestone
269 N.W.2d 28 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1978)
Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.
581 P.2d 50 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1978)
Lemp v. Town Board
90 Misc. 2d 360 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)