Gilmore v. The City of New York
Opinion
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT a — SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK nate FILED: 2/19/2021 192021 DWAYNE GILMORE, et al., Plaintiffs, 19-CV-6091 (GBD) (BCM) -against- ORDER CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant.
BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge. The Court is in receipt of the parties’ letter-motion for approval of their proposed settlement agreement pursuant to Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). (Dkt. No. 89.) However, plaintiffs' counsel neglected to attach a copy of their retainer agreement with plaintiffs, as required by the Court's January 19, 2021 Order. (Dkt. No. 86.) Additionally, the Court requests that the parties submit a supplemental letter-brief addressing whether and to what extent the Court should consider, when analyzing the "degree of success" that counsel obtained for their clients, Fisher v. SD Prot. Inc., 948 F.3d 593, 606-07 (2d Cir. 2020), the fact that only four of the nine individuals who were at one time plaintiffs in this action will obtain any recovery. The supplemental materials shall be submitted no later than February 26, 2021. Dated: New York, New York February 19, 2021 SO ORDERED. wR BARBARA MOSES United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gilmore v. The City of New York (Gilmore v. The City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.