Gilmore v. Syracuse Lighting Co.

116 A.D. 921, 101 N.Y.S. 1123

This text of 116 A.D. 921 (Gilmore v. Syracuse Lighting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gilmore v. Syracuse Lighting Co., 116 A.D. 921, 101 N.Y.S. 1123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Williams and Nash, JJ., who dissented on the ground that the defendant has not been shown guilty of negligence and also because of errors in the charge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 A.D. 921, 101 N.Y.S. 1123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilmore-v-syracuse-lighting-co-nyappdiv-1906.