Gilmore v. Pope
5 Mass. 491
Opinion
All the facts necessary to maintain the action are agreed, provided any action lies on the subscription, and that such action could be sued by the present plaintiff. It has been settled in the case of The Worcester Turnpike Corporation vs. Willard
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gilmore v. Pope, 5 Mass. 491 (Mass. 1809).
5 Mass. 491 (Gilmore v. Pope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. Nickell
79 S.E. 1020 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1913)
Pelton v. Baker
33 N.E. 394 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)
Grinnell v. Buchanan
1 Daly 538 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1866)
Considerant v. . Brisbane
22 N.Y. 389 (New York Court of Appeals, 1860)
Bank of Newbury v. Baldwin
2 F. Cas. 663 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1860)
Colburn v. Phillips
79 Mass. 64 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1859)
Considerant v. Brisbane
2 Bosw. 471 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1858)
Goodman v. Walker
30 Ala. 482 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1857)
Eastern Railroad v. Benedict
71 Mass. 561 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1856)
Dupont v. Mount Pleasant Ferry Co.
43 S.C.L. 255 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1856)
Hunter v. Field
20 Ohio St. 340 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1851)
Townsend v. Hoyle
20 Conn. 1 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1849)
Heckscher v. Binney
11 F. Cas. 1016 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1847)
Welles v. Newberry
29 F. Cas. 620 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan, 1847)
Nisbet v. Lawson
1 Ga. 275 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1846)
Fortune v. Brazier
10 Ala. 791 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1846)
Commonwealth v. President of the Phœnix Bank
52 Mass. 129 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1846)
Bayley v. Onondaga County Mutual Insurance
6 Hill & Den. 476 (New York Supreme Court, 1844)
Hazard v. Planters' & Merchants' Bank
4 Ala. 299 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1842)
Alston v. Heartman
2 Ala. 699 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1841)