Gilmore v. First Nat. Bank of Ada

1914 OK 276, 141 P. 433, 43 Okla. 151, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 474
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided June 16, 1914·No. 6266·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

KANE, C. J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon the motion of the defendant in error to dismiss the proceeding in error, for the reason that the motion for new trial was by the trial court overruled on the 9th day of October, 1913, and the petition in error and case-made was not filed in the Supreme Court within six months after the overruling of the motion for new trial. As the proceeding in error was not filed in this court within the time prescribed by law, the motion to dismiss must be sustained.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilmore v. First Nat. Bank of Ada, 1914 OK 276, 141 P. 433, 43 Okla. 151, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 474 (Okla. 1914).

1914 OK 276 (Gilmore v. First Nat. Bank of Ada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Springer
1919 OK 202 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1919)