Gilmore v. Burks

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gilmore v. Burks

325 So. 2d 455

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 21, 1976

DocketNo. Y-177

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 325 So. 2d 455 (Gilmore v. Burks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilmore v. Burks, 325 So. 2d 455 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon considering the briefs, the record, and oral argument, we find no reversible error. Unused annual leave payments should not be considered compensation in computing pension benefits under the provisions of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund of the City of Pensacola, Florida, and under the facts presented by the record in this case.

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

BOYER, C. J., MILLS, J., and CAW-THON, VICTOR M., Associate Judge, ■ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon considering the briefs, the record, and oral argument, we find no reversible error. Unused annual leave payments should not be considered compensation in computing pension benefits under the provisions of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund of the City of Pensacola, Florida, and under the facts presented by the record in this case.

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

BOYER, C. J., MILLS, J., and CAW-THON, VICTOR M., Associate Judge, ■ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

325 So. 2d 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilmore-v-burks-fladistctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack