Gilmore v. Burks

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gilmore v. Burks

325 So. 2d 455

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 21, 1976·No. No. Y-177·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon considering the briefs, the record, and oral argument, we find no reversible error. Unused annual leave payments should not be considered compensation in computing pension benefits under the provisions of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund of the City of Pensacola, Florida, and under the facts presented by the record in this case.

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

BOYER, C. J., MILLS, J., and CAW-THON, VICTOR M., Associate Judge, ■ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon considering the briefs, the record, and oral argument, we find no reversible error. Unused annual leave payments should not be considered compensation in computing pension benefits under the provisions of Firemen’s Relief and Pension Fund of the City of Pensacola, Florida, and under the facts presented by the record in this case.

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

BOYER, C. J., MILLS, J., and CAW-THON, VICTOR M., Associate Judge, ■ concur.

Gilmore v. Burks, 325 So. 2d 455 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

325 So. 2d 455 (Gilmore v. Burks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related