Gilmore, M. v. C.C.P., Phila., Cty.
This text of Gilmore, M. v. C.C.P., Phila., Cty. (Gilmore, M. v. C.C.P., Phila., Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
MARVIN GILMORE, : No. 78 EM 2014 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, ET. AL.; : DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF : PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, ET. AL., : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2014, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are
DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (hybrid
representation not permitted). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to
counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gilmore, M. v. C.C.P., Phila., Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilmore-m-v-ccp-phila-cty-pa-2014.